I propose the term “Adversarial Infrastructure” to subvert the conventional understanding of bridges as connectors, objects of linkage that function in opposition to walls and borders, the emblematic tools of territorial disconnection and delimination. In 2016, Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, proclaimed:
“Instead of walls, we can help people build bridges”.
This is not an invention of his PR team. Indeed, bridges exist wthin the social imagination as symbols of unity and peace, standing in contrast to the violent images of separation evoked by border walls.
Logistics is covering the violence it is inflicting more than efficiently by rendering itself invisible. Nevertheless, the problem is not only the reduction of flow to the destination point in the movement. When being analysed, logistics is too often understood as the “capacity to move goods” that aims for planetary flux and therefore exists in opposition to disruption. I present Adversarial Infrastructure as the logic of the contemporary mobility regimes — what Salter defines as a new form of logistics that does not guarantee the mobility of any actor but instead brings about its restriction (Salter 2013). It is a structure in which certain actors are rendered (im)mobile, and their capacity to function outside of the programmed pattern is “removed from the political realm and treated as either technical or economic questions” (Salter 2013, 9).
The term “adversarial” comes from its use in machine learning methods. Adversarial machine learning is based on the idea that algorithms can learn via competition. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) consist of two neural networks that are designed to be antagonistic to one another. Even though their functions are programmed to oppose each other, their entrapment in a looped contest strengthens the neural network as a whole.This same capacity defines Adversarial Infrastructure: while divergent functions may appear to create friction and technical problems for one another, when taken together they actually strengthen the infrastructure’s capacity to inflict harm.